Posts tagged ‘Civil Unions’

11/02/2011

Huntsman: Obama’s Greatest Threat

Former Utah Gov. John Huntsman, a man who sounds reasonable, and who previously served Presidents Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, and Obama, correctly said he is the only Republican who could attract independents, yet the conservative base of the GOP has disregarded his sound advice, while they drift towards the vague set of principles outlined by Gov. Mitt Romney.

AFGHAN: Huntsman would take votes away from Obama in foreign policy with his pledge to bring American troops home from Afghanistan. In no uncertain terms, he said, after 10 years of war, it is time to get out, and do nation-building here in the U.S. Only the people of Afghanistan can save Afghanistan, and only the Pakistanis can save Pakistan, Huntsman said.

CHINA: As a former Ambassador to China, Huntsman said a President should know something about China, and have a dialog with them. He understands international trade, as he worried sanctions against China over currency manipulations would only lead to retaliation, since we also manipulate our currency. A trade war, he said, would only hurt U.S. agricultural exports.

OIL: With respect to fuel for our cars, Huntsman wisely observed the true cost of gas includes federal spending to keep the Persian Gulf sea lanes open. Gas prices are otherwise determined in the market, he said, and cannot be controlled by government.

GAS: As to environmental regulation, Huntsman, a global businessman, said the EPA hurts corporate expansion. He accused the EPA of running a “reign of terror.” He wants natural gas developed, since he thinks wind and sun can’t be used right now.

IMMIGRATION: Huntsman wants legal immigration fixed. Two of his seven children, from India and China, help him see the issue through their eyes. He favors securing U.S. borders, but is reluctant to send all illegals home. While he was the Gov. of Utah, he let them obtain Drivers Licenses.

HEALTH CARE: Huntsman, out in front of the curve, asked how the health care issue would be resolved, if the Republicans succeeded in repealing Obama’s law. He said the plan to reduce the uninsured by simply mandating coverage is wrong, since the problem is the affordability of health insurance. He noted the IRS is gearing up with 19,500 employees to administer the insurance mandate, but he wants a health care solution that works in the market, and wants to experiment at the state level.

DEBT-TAXES: Huntsman wisely said he would never let the U.S. default, but called the National Debt a cancer. He refused to make any tax pledge, but said this is the worst time to increase them. He worked with a flat tax in Utah, but appeared to be willing to keep federal income tax brackets of 8%, 14%, and 22%.

CORPORATE WELFARE: Huntsman would eliminate corporate welfare, subsidies, tax loopholes, and deductions for individuals, as recommended by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles Commission.

JOBS: Huntsman said it is tragic 15 million are unemployed. He thinks he can create jobs through regulatory reform, repealing the health care law, changes in the tax code, energy independence, and by terminating corporate welfare. He wants to create an environment favorable to business, and thinks he could regain our industrial base by lowering taxes and lessening regulations.

CIVIL UNIONS Huntsman, a Mormon, said Civil Unions are acceptable, and asked Republicans to do a better job on equality.

SCIENCE & EDUCATION: Huntsman said Republicans should not be anti-science. He thinks early childhood literacy is important, but wants education local, with no unfunded mandates.

CONCLUSION: Huntsman has a good resume. His foreign policy on Afghanistan is correct. He understands China. He would develop domestic gas. He would increase legal immigration. He correctly sees the health care problem as one of uncontrolled costs. His desire to eliminate corporate welfare, subsidies, tax loopholes and deductions is good. He was right on the Debt-Ceiling. His jobs plan is vague. He supports civil unions. He stood up for science in schools. Fortunately for Obama, the Republicans do not appear willing to support candidate John Huntsman.

Advertisements
08/16/2011

Bachmann & God’s Plan: Deny Liberty

Minnesota Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann, former Sen. Rick Santorum, and other Republicans at the Iowa Straw Poll this past weekend, showed their willingness to impose fundamentalist religious beliefs on all Americans, as they advocated social policies outlawing abortion, gay marriage, and other freedoms.

At the Straw Poll were: 2 Evangelical Lutherans, Bachmann and Pawlenty, 2 Mormons, Romney and Huntsman, 2 Baptists, Paul and Cain, and 2 conservative Catholics, Gingrich and Santorum.

In the 1960 presidential race, Democrat John Kennedy, a left-of-center Catholic, made every effort to separate church and state, by distancing his personal religious views from the public policies he advocated. He made no effort, while campaigning, or as president, to convert his religious beliefs into federal law. He understood the 1st Amendment ban against the establishment of religion.

In the 2012 campaign, Republicans like Bachmann, Santorum, and others, do not understand the letter, spirit, or intent of the Constitution. They don’t appreciate the secular nature of the American system. If they gained control, they would establish a Christian Nation, by imposing their religious views on us all.

Instead of embracing the secular right to liberty found in the 5th and 14th Amendments, which allows women in the first trimester of their pregnancies to have an abortion, Bachmann would instead implement her non-negotiable religious convictions, which were solidified for her at the Oral Roberts Law School. She believes the termination of a fetus is the same as murder, and wants to force all Americans to live under the rules established by her church.

While former Penn. Sen. Santorum correctly described Bachmann as one who demands everything, and compromises nothing, he too harbors uncompromising views derived from his conservative Catholic beliefs, as he promised to criminally prosecute all doctors who perform abortions, even though it is legal to do so.

Bachmann pledged not to nominate activist judges, but what she meant to say was she would not name any liberal activists. She certainly intends to nominate right-wing activists, like Supreme Court Justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts, who share her views. She apparently does not realize that the conservatives on the court are just as active in shaping the law, as some liberals.

As to the issue of marriage, Bachmann was asked to explain a comment she once made that wives should be submissive to their husbands. She instead dodged the question, saying submission meant respect, an entirely new definition, not in any dictionary.

Although laws as to marriage and divorce have always been made at the state level, Santorum wants to throw out the 10th Amendment, and govern all families from Wash. DC. He disapproves of states’ rights on this and would rather dictate his religious dogma nationally. He was proud of his efforts in Iowa, where he helped defeat state justices, who found illegal the ban on gay marriage.

Romney joined Santorum in his ill-conceived idea to govern marriage from Washington. He wants the Constitution amended, so marriages are limited to just one man and one woman.

Huntsman, the only reasonable Republican as to social issues, said civil unions are acceptable. He warned the Republican audience that they need to do a better job on equality. Perhaps what the Republicans should do is start listening to Huntsman, and stop hearing voices from God.